Work in progress: 181,232 of 181,233 sites checked so far, more every week · updated 2 Nov 2026Missing a blog? Tell us

Top all-time · #10291

A

Alois Kraus

Personal blog · aloiskraus.wordpress.comprogramminghardwaresystems

Alois Kraus's personal blog at aloiskraus.wordpress.com covers programming, hardware and systems. Since 2017, 7 different Hacker News readers have linked it 7 times, most often “Why Skylake CPUs Are Sometimes 50% Slower”. It is still writing: the last post was on 2026-03-16, and you can follow it by feed.

Visit the blog
7mentions?
7HN people?
2017–2026first – last linked?
Links on Hacker News per year · peak 2 in 2022

Too few sampled comments (3) to say how often HN recommends it.?

Why HN links it

HN commenters link Alois Kraus's posts as a source on how the x86 pause instruction's cycle cost varies widely between CPUs, including Skylake-SP raising it to as many as 140 cycles.

Summarised by Claude from a sample of 3 HN comments that link here. Each comment is marked recommending, critical or neutral (citing without judging); how this works.

Performance is everything. But correctness comes first.

Most-linked posts?

  1. Why Skylake CPUs Are Sometimes 50% Slower
    5 people · 5 mentions · first linked 2018-06-18

What Hacker News says?

  1. > One problem with the x86 pause instruction is the number of cycles spent paused has varied dramatically from one CPU to another. Some CPU models ignore it. On others it is very short, a few or ten cycles, and on some it is hundreds of cycles. Here's a previous HN discussion about that (in particular Skylake CPUs greatly diverging from previous behaviour): https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17336853 Original link…

    Comment linking /2018/06/16/why-skylakex-cpus-are-sometimes-50-slower-how-intel-has-broken-existing-code/

    on “Improving Firefox Responsiveness on macOS”
  2. Submitted Why Skylake CPUs Are Sometimes 50% Slower as a story · 553 points

    HN discussion
  3. In skylake, they increased the duration of pause from "about 10 cycles" to "as many as 140 cycles". https://aloiskraus.wordpress.com/2018/06/16/why-skylakex-cpu...

    Comment linking /2018/06/16/why-skylakex-cpus-are-sometimes-50-slower-how-intel-has-broken-existing-code/

    on “A flexible, lightweight, spin-lock barrier”
  4. Submitted Why Skylake CPUs Are Sometimes 50% Slower (2018) as a story · 119 points

    HN discussion
  5. You could first measure the perf impact of the fence instruction and then subtract that out? But yeah I guess it may not matter much for quick and dirty calibration loop. I found somewhere ( https://aloiskraus.wordpress.com/2018/06/16/why-skylakex-cpu... ) that the pause instruction had this wild cycle difference between different CPU and it caused some grief, I had no idea. I stopped doing low level coding a while…

    Comment linking /2018/06/16/why-skylakex-cpus-are-sometimes-50-slower-how-intel-has-broken-existing-code/

    on “Spinning around: Please don't – Common problems with spin locks”
  6. Submitted Windows Task Manager Shows Misleading Values as a story · 4 points

    HN discussion
  7. Submitted The Definitive Serialization Performance Guide as a story · 2 points

    HN discussion

Search all of HN for aloiskraus.wordpress.com