Work in progress: 181,232 of 181,233 sites checked so far, more every week · updated 2 Nov 2026Missing a blog? Tell us

Top all-time · #11620

C

Carter Sande

Personal blog · carter.sande.duodecima.technologyprogrammingweb

Carter Sande's personal blog at carter.sande.duodecima.technology covers programming and web. Since 2019, 6 different Hacker News readers have linked it 12 times, most often “Browsers are pretty good at loading pages”. No feed was found, so read it on the site itself.

No feed foundVisit the blog
12mentions?
6HN people?
2019–2026first – last linked?
Links on Hacker News per year · peak 4 in 2026

Too few sampled comments (1) to say how often HN recommends it.?

Why HN links it

HN readers link this post on web performance. It quotes the post's point that the HTML version of Gmail uses fewer network resources and returns to interaction sooner than the fully reloaded version.

Summarised by Claude from a sample of 1 HN comments that link here. Each comment is marked recommending, critical or neutral (citing without judging); how this works.

Professional computer programmer and recovering children's book character.

Most-linked posts?

  1. Browsers are pretty good at loading pages
    5 people · 7 mentions · first linked 2019-07-21
  2. Every JavaScript bundler handles inline <script> tags wrong
    2 people · 2 mentions · first linked 2026-07-05

What Hacker News says?

  1. > Despite fully reloading the page, the HTML version of Gmail consumes fewer network resources (~70KiB) and takes less overall time to return to interaction. Reminds me of the article "Browsers are pretty good at loading pages, it turns out" [1]. It's really shocking that we've got technology that from an a priori standpoint has the capability of making web browsing faster, yet consistently due to poor development p…

    Comment linking /javascript-page-navigation/

    on “Towards a unified theory of web performance”
  2. Submitted Browsers are pretty good at loading pages as a story · 592 points

    HN discussion
  3. Bun's bundler claimed the bottom place in my recent analysis of how JavaScript tools handle generating inline script tags[1], because despite making lofty promises about being able to bundle applications into standalone HTML files, it produced a baffling combination of spurious syntax errors and miscompilations when presented with tricky code. I'm pretty sure the version I tested was the Zig one (have they made a st…

    Comment linking /inline-script-pitfalls/

    on “My Thoughts on the Bun Rust Rewrite”
  4. Submitted My personal wishlist for a decentralized social network as a story · 361 points

    HN discussion
  5. Submitted Browsers are pretty good at loading pages, it turns out as a story · 3 points

    HN discussion
  6. Submitted Browsers are pretty good at loading pages, it turns out (2019) as a story · 3 points

    HN discussion
  7. Submitted Browsers are pretty good at loading pages, it turns out (2019) as a story · 3 points

    HN discussion
  8. Submitted Every JavaScript bundler handles inline <script> tags wrong as a story · 2 points

    HN discussion
  9. Submitted Browsers are pretty good at loading pages, it turns out (2019) as a story · 2 points

    HN discussion
  10. Submitted Every JavaScript bundler handles inline script tags wrong as a story · 1 points

    HN discussion
  11. Submitted Getting Hitched to “Love Plus” [pdf] as a story · 1 points

    HN discussion
  12. Submitted Browsers are pretty good at loading pages, it turns out (2019) as a story · 1 points

    HN discussion

Search all of HN for carter.sande.duodecima.technology