Work in progress: 181,232 of 181,233 sites checked so far, more every week · updated 2 Nov 2026Missing a blog? Tell us

Top all-time · #18832

H

Hōrōshi バガボンド

Personal blog · blog.katanaquant.comprogrammingai

Hōrōshi バガボンド writes Vagabond Research, a personal blog at blog.katanaquant.com about programming and ai. Since 2026, 4 different Hacker News readers have linked it 4 times, most often “LLM Doesn't Write Correct Code. It Writes Plausible Code”. It is still writing: the last post was on 2026-04-03, and you can follow it by feed.

Visit the blog
4mentions?
4HN people?
2026–2026first – last linked?

Too few sampled comments (3) to say how often HN recommends it.?

Why HN links it

Linked in comments about AI-generated code and rewrites, as a source for the point that LLM output needs a definition of correctness and measurement before it can be trusted. Used as supporting evidence, not praised directly.

Summarised by Claude from a sample of 3 HN comments that link here. Each comment is marked recommending, critical or neutral (citing without judging); how this works.

code monkey.

Most-linked posts?

  1. LLM Doesn't Write Correct Code. It Writes Plausible Code
    4 people · 4 mentions · first linked 2026-03-07

What Hacker News says?

  1. Just a cautionary case of porting to Rust using AI https://blog.katanaquant.com/p/your-llm-doesnt-write-correct...

    Comment linking /p/your-llm-doesnt-write-correct-code

    on “Bun's experimental Rust rewrite hits 99.8% test compatibility on Linux x64 glibc”
  2. Submitted LLM Doesn't Write Correct Code. It Writes Plausible Code as a story · 6 points

    HN discussion
  3. According to the https://blog.katanaquant.com/p/your-llm-doesnt-write-correct... previously discussed on HN, it may be at least partially true: > The vibes are not enough. Define what correct means. Then measure.

    Comment linking /p/your-llm-doesnt-write-correct-code

    on “Claude built a system in 3 rounds, latent bugs from round 1 exploded in round 3”
  4. https://blog.katanaquant.com/p/your-llm-doesnt-write-correct... It can generate plausible code because the examples are already in the training set, the documentation, the how-to-write-a-database, other databases, etc. But unless you could write SQLite yourself it will be hard to specify a good one and to get the generator to produce a correct implementation.

    Comment linking /p/your-llm-doesnt-write-correct-code

    on “John Carmack about open source and anti-AI activists”

Search all of HN for blog.katanaquant.com