Work in progress: 181,232 of 181,233 sites checked so far, more every week · updated 2 Nov 2026Missing a blog? Tell us

Top all-time · #13429

J

Jeremy Faust

Personal blog · insidemedicine.substack.comhealthsciencepolitics

Jeremy Faust writes Inside Medicine, a personal blog at insidemedicine.substack.com about health, science and politics. Since 2025, 5 different Hacker News readers have linked it 5 times, most often “CDC: Unpublished manuscripts mentioning certain topics must be pulled or revised”. It is still writing: the last post was on 2026-10-25, and you can follow it by feed.

Visit the blog
5mentions?
5HN people?
2025–2026first – last linked?
Links on Hacker News per year · peak 3 in 2025

Too few sampled comments (2) to say how often HN recommends it.?

Why HN links it

Cited on HN as a source for news about a CDC order retracting federally funded research by keyword and a related Trump-era publication censorship. The comments do not assess the writing itself.

Summarised by Claude from a sample of 2 HN comments that link here. Each comment is marked recommending, critical or neutral (citing without judging); how this works.

Merging what I'm seeing in the ER with rigorous deep-dives on the very latest medical and public health data. I want you to know what really matters.

Most-linked posts?

  1. CDC: Unpublished manuscripts mentioning certain topics must be pulled or revised
    2 people · 2 mentions · first linked 2025-02-02

What Hacker News says?

  1. https://insidemedicine.substack.com/p/how-many-kills-does-do... https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=C3b2dd7NFZg You are full of it.

    Comment linking /p/how-many-kills-does-doge-have-how

    on “Switzerland's Federal Government Is Replacing Microsoft on 3k Computers”
  2. Submitted CDC: Unpublished manuscripts mentioning certain topics must be pulled or revised as a story · 844 points

    HN discussion
  3. I can in fact. Trump literally just issued a mass retraction and censorship of research publication depending on a set of keywords [1]. That is, by definition, a word ban for CDC-funded research. In fact you posted in that thread on HN, so you should already be very well aware of it. [1] https://insidemedicine.substack.com/p/breaking-news-cdc-orde...

    Comment linking /p/breaking-news-cdc-orders-mass-retraction

    on “Words flagged in search of current NSF awards”
  4. Submitted CDC officials’ resignation emails as a story · 246 points

    HN discussion
  5. Submitted The Covid-19 vaccine paper the CDC censored as a story · 2 points

    HN discussion

Search all of HN for insidemedicine.substack.com