Top all-time · #23743
Joomy Korkut
Personal blog · joomy.korkutblech.com/posts · on HN as joomyprogrammingmath
Joomy Korkut's personal blog at joomy.korkutblech.com covers programming and math. Since 2026, 3 different Hacker News readers have linked it 4 times, most often “Why Rocq is better than Lean for program verification”. It is still writing: the last post was on 2026-07-28, and you can follow it by feed.
Too few sampled comments (1) to say how often HN recommends it.?
Why HN links it
Only one HN comment, which says the commenter had to look up the author's publication list to understand a Rocq-to-C++ extraction project. Linked posts cover that verified-C++ extraction work.
Summarised by Claude from a sample of 1 HN comments that link here. Each comment is marked recommending, critical or neutral (citing without judging); how this works.
Joomy's web site and blog.
Most-linked posts?
- Why Rocq is better than Lean for program verification2 people · 3 mentions · first linked 2026-07-28
What Hacker News says?
If I understand this correctly, it translates Rocq to C++? Took me several minutes to even understand what this is. Why is it called an extraction system? Who is this for? I'm confused. edit: I had to dig into the author's publication list: https://joomy.korkutblech.com/papers/crane-rocqpl26.pdf Testing remains a fundamental practice for building confidence in software, but it can only establish correctness over a f…
Comment linking /papers/crane-rocqpl26.pdf
on “Extracting verified C++ from the Rocq theorem prover at Bloomberg”Submitted Why Rocq is better than Lean for program verification as a story · 2 points
HN discussionSubmitted Why Rocq is better than Lean for program verification as a story · 2 points
HN discussionSubmitted Why Rocq is better than Lean for program verification as a story · 2 points
HN discussion