Work in progress: 181,232 of 181,233 sites checked so far, more every week · updated 2 Nov 2026Missing a blog? Tell us

Top all-time · #13470

N

Nathan Hammond

Personal blog · nathanhammond.com · on HN as nathanhammondprogrammingwebculture

Nathan Hammond writes nathan hammond, a personal blog at nathanhammond.com about programming, web and culture. Since 2009, 5 different Hacker News readers have linked it 18 times, most often “Name.com: Another Unscrupulous Registrar”. No feed was found, so read it on the site itself.

No feed foundVisit the blog
18mentions?
5HN people?
2009–2016first – last linked?
Links on Hacker News per year · peak 11 in 2011

Too few sampled comments (3) to say how often HN recommends it.?

Why HN links it

HN commenters link this post as a source on Name.com, describing its ad display on unconfigured subdomains, which the company keeps revenue from, and its terms that put content legality on the domain owner.

Summarised by Claude from a sample of 3 HN comments that link here. Each comment is marked recommending, critical or neutral (citing without judging); how this works.

My personal blog following my adventures in life and technology.

The author on HN?

nathanhammond · 541 karma · member since 2009

@nathanhammond hn@nathanhammond.com https://www.nathanhammond.com [ my public key: https://keybase.io/nathanhammond; my proof: https://keybase.io/nathanhammond/sigs/R8aq_5n728eDFXos9Ffd28y_lV_ltZ9Wa-YxB0FxIpU ]

From their public HN profile, which links to this site.

Most-linked posts?

  1. Name.com: Another Unscrupulous Registrar
    3 people · 5 mentions · first linked 2011-04-13

What Hacker News says?

  1. Name.com is pretty evil too. They opt you in to a "service" that displays ads from your domain (where they keep the revenue, of course), and say that you are responsible for ensuring that the content is legal See http://nathanhammond.com/namedotcom-another-unscrupulous-reg...

    Comment linking /namedotcom-another-unscrupulous-registrar

    on “Startups should not use GoDaddy. Ever”
  2. Submitted Name.com: Another Unscrupulous Registrar as a story · 95 points

    HN discussion
  3. Name.com is pretty bad too http://nathanhammond.com/namedotcom-another-unscrupulous-reg... Basically: They opt customers in to a "service" where they show ads on any subdomain they haven't setup a DNS record for. Name.com keeps all the money, but the TOS says that you are responsible for making sure that they content that they choose to display on your domain is legal .

    Comment linking /namedotcom-another-unscrupulous-registrar

    on “Desperation: Go Daddy calling customers, begging them to stay”
  4. Submitted Abusing Facebook's "Publicly Available Information" as a story · 20 points

    HN discussion
  5. This type of attack has been possible for years, but wasn't really replicating until the advent of social networking. Here is the bug I filed with Mozilla the first time I saw this type of attack in the wild: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=527530 There is a lot of interesting discussion in the thread, and Brendan Eich shows up to throw up his two cents in as well. Also, here is my blog post discussing…

    Comment linking /social-engineering-issue-with-javascript-urls

    on “Self-XSS attack explained”
  6. Submitted Dear Santa Steve (Jobs) as a story · 3 points

    HN discussion
  7. Be sure to check your DNS setup. Ensure that asdf.yourdomain.com is not redirecting to one of their ad pages. Full story here: http://nathanhammond.com/namedotcom-another-unscrupulous-reg...

    Comment linking /namedotcom-another-unscrupulous-registrar

    on “Bots are crawling new domain registrations and namesquatting Twitter handles”
  8. Submitted Name.com: Another Unscrupulous Registrar as a story · 3 points

    HN discussion
  9. I've used Name.com for years. Their interface is clean and they offer domain privacy for free when using their coupon.[1] Unfortunately, I wouldn't describe the company as trustworthy for two reasons. First, Name.com was hacked[2] in May of 2013 and they weren't transparent about it. I learned more about the hack from the attackers[3] than Name.com. Second, Name.com displays advertisements on parked domains for whic…

    Comment linking /namedotcom-another-unscrupulous-registrar

    on “Ask HN: What are some trustworthy Domain Registrars?”
  10. Submitted On Digital Identity, Technology Dependents, and Death as a story · 3 points

    HN discussion
  11. Submitted Route-recognizer – nathan hammond as a story · 2 points

    HN discussion
  12. Submitted The Programming Interview as a story · 2 points

    HN discussion
  13. Submitted iosfont - A script to install fonts on iOS as a story · 2 points

    HN discussion
  14. Submitted Git-ing Started With HTML5 Boilerplate as a story · 2 points

    HN discussion
  15. Submitted The Building Of radiationinfo.org as a story · 2 points

    HN discussion
  16. Submitted Patterns for Subscription-Based Billing as a story · 1 points

    HN discussion
  17. Submitted The building of RadiationInfo.org as a story · 1 points

    HN discussion
  18. Submitted Monetizing Episodic Content as a story · 1 points

    HN discussion

Search all of HN for nathanhammond.com