Top all-time · #15827
Thompson Coburn LLP
Company blog · thompsoncoburn.com/insights/blogsbusinesspolitics
Thompson Coburn LLP is the company blog at thompsoncoburn.com, writing about business and politics. Since 2018, 5 different Hacker News readers have linked it 6 times. It is still writing: the last post was on 2026-10-30, and you can follow it by feed.
Too few sampled comments (4) to say how often HN recommends it.?
Why HN links it
Commenters link Thompson Coburn law-firm blog posts as sources on food labelling, courtroom cameras, hyperlink copyright and a pro forma session. None of the comments judge the writing itself.
Summarised by Claude from a sample of 4 HN comments that link here. Each comment is marked recommending, critical or neutral (citing without judging); how this works.
Thompson Coburn is a leading law firm providing innovative legal solutions and exceptional client service across industries and practice areas.
What Hacker News says?
I hate how they can obfuscate the fact that they're not dairy. Via their labels and shelf placement. I've bought them on accident. It's always obvious to me on first taste, but from the superficial supermarket look, it is not. I'd think they get the 'wings' treatment. https://www.thompsoncoburn.com/insights/blogs/food-fight/pos...
Comment linking /insights/blogs/food-fight/post/2020-09-09/boneless-wings-or-saucy-nugs-viral-video-provides-lesson-on-food-labeling-laws
on “Vegan cheese has quietly but steadily infiltrated mainstream supermarket shelves”Submitted When is a revision of an Internet post treated as a new post? as a story · 1 points
HN discussionCameras are allowed in Florida state courtrooms. Cameras are prohibited in federal courts. Strange that the article failed to mention the Dr. Sam Shephard murder trial: see, https://www.thompsoncoburn.com/docs/default-source/Bio-relat... (pdf)
Comment linking /docs/default-source/Bio-related-documents/television-cameras-in-court.pdf?sfvrsn=2&sfvrsn=2
on “Charles Lindbergh is the reason the U.S. doesn't have cameras in the courtroom”Submitted New Internet frontier: you can defame through your WiFi name as a story · 1 points
HN discussionWell, I guess the most I can say is that using URLs is a legal gray area. Some reading material [0] [1] [2] [3]. Thanks for the discussion. [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright_aspects_of_hyperlink... [1] https://www.thompsoncoburn.com/insights/blogs/internet-law-t... [2] https://btlj.org/data/articles2015/vol16/16_3/16-berkeley-te... [3] https://curia.europa.eu/jcms/upload/docs/application/pdf/201...
Comment linking /insights/blogs/internet-law-twists-turns/post/2013-08-09/hyperlinks-are-lawful---unless-you-use-them-unlawfully
on “Sources: OpenSea Eyes $13B Valuation”I am not interested in being dragged into an argument about this, and of course the supreme court can try to calvinball whatever they want. That being said, your interpretation is at a minimum disputed by one of the largest law firms in the country ( https://www.thompsoncoburn.com/insights/pro-forma-session-10... ).
Comment linking /insights/pro-forma-session-102jjx1/
on “Trump cancels bipartisan housing bill, reiterates demand for SAVE America Act”