Work in progress: 181,232 of 181,233 sites checked so far, more every week · updated 2 Nov 2026Missing a blog? Tell us

Top all-time · #14813

T

Tomáš Janoušek

Personal blog · work.lisk.inprogrammingsystems

Tomáš Janoušek's personal blog at work.lisk.in covers programming and systems. Since 2020, 5 different Hacker News readers have linked it 10 times, most often “Even faster bash startup (165 ms → 40 ms)”. The last post was in 2023, but the archive is still widely read.

Visit the blog
10mentions?
5HN people?
2020–2023first – last linked?
Links on Hacker News per year · peak 7 in 2020

Too few sampled comments (1) to say how often HN recommends it.?

Why HN links it

HN readers link this post by Tomáš Janoušek on speeding up bash startup. The comment thread centres on measuring startup time with hyperfine and whether the post's figures match real-world timing.

Summarised by Claude from a sample of 1 HN comments that link here. Each comment is marked recommending, critical or neutral (citing without judging); how this works.

Most-linked posts?

  1. Even faster bash startup (165 ms → 40 ms)
    5 people · 5 mentions · first linked 2020-11-20

What Hacker News says?

  1. Another useful thing to have in one's PS1 is an optional newline if the last output didn't print one itself. Turns out this is non-trivial to get working perfectly ( https://stackoverflow.com/questions/19943482/configure-shell... , https://work.lisk.in/2020/11/20/even-faster-bash-startup.htm... ). The version that I've been using for a while without problems is this one: function __col1_ps1 { [[ $MC_SID ]] && return…

    Comment linking /2020/11/20/even-faster-bash-startup.html

    on “Bash PS1 Generator”
  2. Submitted Even Faster Bash Startup as a story · 4 points

    HN discussion
  3. tl;dr: If you're seeing unreasonably short startup times, try `hyperfine 'bash -i'` instead. Funny, I thought my startup time was going to be ginormous, considering I've literally committed to it 203 times so far[1]. Nope, 1.4 to 4.3 ms . Update: Eyeballing the startup time it's definitely over a second, so I'm guessing OP is measuring something different from what I'm seeing. `hyperfine bash` is also below 5 ms, so…

    Comment linking /2020/11/20/even-faster-bash-startup.html

    on “My Faster Bash Startup (2020)”
  4. Submitted Even Faster Bash Startup as a story · 4 points

    HN discussion
  5. Submitted Even faster bash startup (165 ms → 40 ms) as a story · 4 points

    HN discussion
  6. Submitted Linux, media keys and mul­ti­ple play­ers (mpd, chromium, mpv, vlc,) as a story · 4 points

    HN discussion
  7. Submitted Side by side Git-range-diff as a story · 2 points

    HN discussion
  8. Submitted Even Faster Bash Startup as a story · 2 points

    HN discussion
  9. Submitted Show HN: A bet­ter xrandr com­mand-line ex­pe­ri­ence as a story · 2 points

    HN discussion
  10. Submitted Font-weight: 300 considered harmful (and a fontconfig workaround) as a story · 2 points

    HN discussion

Search all of HN for work.lisk.in