Work in progress: 181,232 of 181,233 sites checked so far, more every week · updated 2 Nov 2026Missing a blog? Tell us

Top all-time · #4506

M

Morten Linderud

Personal blog · linderud.dev/blog · on HN as Foxboronsystemssecurity

Morten Linderud's personal blog at linderud.dev covers systems and security. Since 2019, 17 different Hacker News readers have linked it 40 times, most often “NixOS is not reproducible”. It is still writing: the last post was on 2026-08-01, and you can follow it by feed.

Visit the blog
40mentions?
17HN people?
2019–2026first – last linked?
Links on Hacker News per year · peak 8 in 2020

Too few sampled comments (4) to say how often HN recommends it.?

Why HN links it

HN readers link Morten Linderud's posts on packaging LXD for Arch Linux and on whether NixOS builds are truly reproducible, topics that come up in homelab and reproducible-build discussions.

Summarised by Claude from a sample of 4 HN comments that link here. Each comment is marked recommending, critical or neutral (citing without judging); how this works.

Meandring through cyberspace

The author on HN?

Foxboron · 3,717 karma · member since 2012

Arch Linux Developer, security team and reproducible builds. https://linderud.dev/ https://github.com/Foxboron [ my public key: https://keybase.io/fox; my proof: https://keybase.io/fox/sigs/LzugxUxnL-9sr_SJ8i6eMsmBZgyt9294JPRa2nnIl8o ]

From their public HN profile, which links to this site.

Most-linked posts?

  1. NixOS is not reproducible
    6 people · 6 mentions · first linked 2024-04-02
  2. Self-hosting DNS for no fun, but a little profit
    4 people · 4 mentions · first linked 2025-11-18
  3. Store SSH keys inside the TPM: SSH-tpm-agent
    3 people · 3 mentions · first linked 2023-10-04
  4. Packaging LXD for Arch Linux
    2 people · 4 mentions · first linked 2020-04-27
  5. Reproducible Arch Linux Packages
    2 people · 3 mentions · first linked 2019-11-11
  6. Pam Bypass: when null(is not)ok
    2 people · 3 mentions · first linked 2020-11-24
  7. Store Age Identities Inside the TPM: age-plugin-tpm
    2 people · 2 mentions · first linked 2023-07-17
  8. Personal Infrastructure Setup 2026
    2 people · 2 mentions · first linked 2026-01-19
  9. Coredumpctl, delve and debug packages for Go
    2 people · 2 mentions · first linked 2022-11-19
  10. Monitoring the kernel.org Transparency Log for a year
    2 people · 2 mentions · first linked 2022-04-16

What Hacker News says?

  1. I'm currently involved in an effort to rip out docker swarm at work because its overlay networks are shockingly unreliable. LXD looks interesting but https://linderud.dev/blog/packaging-lxd-for-arch-linux/ convinced me that it's another Canonical NIH special and probably best avoided (in particular, "only distributed for Ubuntu via snaps" means "forces auto-updates" which means "not going in my environment"). Need t…

    Comment linking /blog/packaging-lxd-for-arch-linux/

    on “Kubernetes is deprecating Docker runtime support”
  2. Submitted NixOS is not reproducible as a story · 112 points

    HN discussion
  3. I did write a bit about my experience packaging LXD for Arch Linux a while back. I got a ping from a Debian dev telling me the Debian dev working on LXD enjoyed the article, and has been trying to pick up on the work again. The linked wiki page is the outdated one. https://linderud.dev/blog/packaging-lxd-for-arch-linux/

    Comment linking /blog/packaging-lxd-for-arch-linux/

    on “LXD – next generation system container manager release 4.3”
  4. Submitted Stream to Chromecast with resolved, vlc and bash as a story · 82 points

    HN discussion
  5. I never got around to submitting my blog to HN. But if people are curious about some technical details of the underlying problems of reproducing Arch Linux packages I wrote something a few months ago. https://linderud.dev/blog/reproducible-arch-linux-packages/ EDIT: I did self-discover I did submit the article when I wrote it. Just forgot. Oh well :)

    Comment linking /blog/reproducible-arch-linux-packages/

    on “Running an independent Arch Linux rebuilder”
  6. Submitted Packaging LXD for Arch Linux as a story · 53 points

    HN discussion
  7. That's rather the tail wagging the dog, isn't it? Besides, it kinda rules out most of the options; almost nobody packages it naively, probably because their build/vendoring/packaging process is insane (see https://linderud.dev/blog/packaging-lxd-for-arch-linux/ ).

    Comment linking /blog/packaging-lxd-for-arch-linux/

    on “RaspberryPi 4 home lab with LXD cluster”
  8. Submitted Mkinitcpio v31 and UEFI Stubs as a story · 42 points

    HN discussion
  9. I’m picking this nit: > When is a build reproducible? > “A build is reproducible if given the same source code, build environment and build instructions, any party can recreate bit-by-bit identical copies of all specified artifacts.” > Neither Nix or NixOS gives you these guarantees. This really makes me question whether all of the quirkiness of Nix is worth it if it can’t actually “pay off” with true reproducibilit…

    Comment linking /blog/nixos-is-not-reproducible/

    on “Rebuilding my homelab: Suffering as a service”
  10. Submitted Monitoring the kernel.org Transparency Log for a year as a story · 38 points

    HN discussion
  11. abathur · 2024-07-10Recommends
    Just writing to agree, since you are getting pushback. @Foxboron wrote a compelling if clickbaity post a few months back to poke at the bit-for-bit interpretation of what reproducibility means in nixland: https://linderud.dev/blog/nixos-is-not-reproducible/ It didn't get much traction here ( https://news.ycombinator.com/from?site=linderud.dev ) but there was more lively discussion on lobsters: https://lobste.rs/s/jp…

    Comment linking /blog/nixos-is-not-reproducible/

    on “Towards Idempotent Rebuilds?”
  12. Submitted NixOS Is Not Reproducible as a story · 17 points

    HN discussion
  13. Submitted Self-hosting DNS for no fun, but a little profit as a story · 15 points

    HN discussion
  14. Submitted NixOS Is Not Reproducible as a story · 15 points

    HN discussion
  15. Submitted Streaming the Steam Deck to OBS as a story · 7 points

    HN discussion
  16. Submitted Self-hosting DNS for no fun, but a little profit as a story · 6 points

    HN discussion
  17. Submitted NixOS Is Not Reproducible as a story · 6 points

    HN discussion
  18. Submitted Self-hosting DNS for no fun, but a little profit as a story · 3 points

    HN discussion
  19. Submitted Easter hack: Terraform-provider-openwrt as a story · 3 points

    HN discussion
  20. Submitted Coredumpctl, delve and debug packages for Go as a story · 3 points

    HN discussion
  21. Submitted Pam Bypass: when null(is not)ok as a story · 3 points

    HN discussion
  22. Submitted Monitoring the kernel.org Transparency Log for a year as a story · 3 points

    HN discussion
  23. Submitted Reproducible Arch Linux Packages as a story · 3 points

    HN discussion
  24. Submitted Personal Infrastructure Setup 2026 as a story · 2 points

    HN discussion
  25. Submitted Self-hosting DNS for no fun, but a little profit as a story · 2 points

    HN discussion
  26. Submitted SSH CA with device and identity attestation: SSH-tpm-ca-authority as a story · 2 points

    HN discussion
  27. Submitted Store SSH keys inside the TPM: SSH-tpm-agent as a story · 2 points

    HN discussion
  28. Submitted Pam bypass: when nullok is not OK as a story · 2 points

    HN discussion
  29. Submitted Pam Bypass: when null(is not)ok as a story · 2 points

    HN discussion
  30. Submitted Improving the Secure Boot user experience as a story · 2 points

    HN discussion

Search all of HN for linderud.dev

Linked by the same people?